Á¤º¸³ª´®ÅÍ

  • ÁÖ¿ä °øÁö»çÇ×
  • ¼º°ø¼ö¼Ó»ç·Ê
  • Áú¹®°ú ´äº¯
  • ¹Ì±¹º¯È£»ç Ä®·³¹æ
  • ÇöÁö´º½º
  • 1:1 »ó´ã½Åû
  • ÃâÀå»ó´ã ½Åû
  • ¼¼¹Ì³ª ¾È³»
  • ´ë¾ç ºí·Î±×
  • ´ë¾ç ¾ð·Ð´º½º
 
 
°ü¸®ÀÚ 2011-02-22 856
ÀÌÄÚ³ë¹Ì½ºÆ® ¼±Á¤ ¼¼°è¿¡¼­ »ì±â Á¦ÀÏ ÆíÇÑ µµ½Ã-ij³ª´Ù top1À§

 

Where the livin' is easiest

 

 

VANCOUVER remains the most liveable city in the world, according to the latest annual ranking compiled by the Economist Intelligence Unit. The Canadian city scored 98 out of a maximum 100, as it has done for the past two years.

The ranking scores 140 cities from 0-100 on 30 factors spread across five areas: stability, health care, culture and environment, education, and infrastructure. These numbers are then weighted and combined to produce an overall figure. The top ten cities occupy the same positions as last year, with the exception of Melbourne and Vienna, which have swapped places.

The report, which some companies use to determine hardship allowances for relocated employees, explains what makes a high-ranked city:

Cities that score best tend to be mid-sized cities in wealthier countries with a relatively low population density. This often fosters a broad range of recreational availability without leading to high crime levels or overburdened infrastructure. Seven of the top ten scoring cities are in Australia and Canada, where population densities of 2.88 and 3.40 people per sq km respectively compare with a global (land) average of 45.65 and a US average of 32.

At the other end of the ranking, Harare, the capital of Zimbabwe, is in 140th place, thanks to particularly poor scores for its stability, healthcare and infrastructure. Somewhere between the extremes sit London and New York in 53rd and 56th places. They are let down by stability scores of 75 and 70, the result in turn of poor scores for the perceived threat of terror and the rates of petty and violent crime.

 

ÀÌÄÚ³ë¹Ì½ºÆ® research group¿¡¼­ ¾îÁ¦ ¹ßÇ¥ÇÑ µû²öµû²öÇÑ ´º½ºÀÔ´Ï´Ù. Áö³­ 5³âµ¿¾È 1À§¸¦ Â÷ÁöÇß´ø ij³ª´Ù ¹êÄí¹ö°¡ ¿ª½Ã À̹ø Â÷Æ®¿¡¼­µµ ¼¼°è¿¡¼­ °¡Àå »ì±â ÆíÇÑ µµ½Ã 1À§·Î ¼Õ²ÅÇû½À´Ï´Ù. TOP5¾È¿¡ 1À§ ¹êÄí¹ö, 4À§ Åä·ÐÅä, ±×¸®°í 5À§ Ķ°Å¸®·Î ij³ª´ÙÀÇ 3°³ µµ½Ã°¡ ·©Å©µÇ¾ú½À´Ï´Ù. ±â»ç ¿ø¹®À» ÷ºÎÇß½À´Ï´Ù.




´ñ±Û³²±â±â  
    
 
 
2011³â 3¿ù ij³ª´Ù ¼ö¼Óµ¿Çâ ¹ý¹«¼ö¼ÓºÎ 2011-03-29 664
ij³ª´Ù À̹μº¿¡¼­ Á¦¾È¿Ã¸° Àü¹®ÀηÂÀ̹ΠÇÁ·Î±×·¥ º¯°æ°èȹ °ü¸®ÀÚ 2011-02-23 845
ij³ª´ÙÅõÀÚÀ̹Π½Å¹ý ½ÃÇà °ü¸®ÀÚ 2010-12-02 782
ij³ª´Ù ´ë»ç°üÁöÁ¤ ȯÀ² 1,150¿øÀ¸·Î º¯°æ(2010.7.1ÀϺÎÅÍ) °ü¸®ÀÚ 2010-07-08 1650
27 ¿¬¹æ±â¼úÀ̹Π°³Á¤À» À§ÇÑ À̹α¹ 1Â÷ °øûȸ ¼Ò½Ä CSIC 2011-03-31 601
26 2011³â 2¿ù ij³ª´Ù ¼ö¼ÓÇöȲ ¹ý¹«¼ö¼ÓÆÀ 2011-02-28 885
25 ¿¬¹æÀü¹®ÀηÂÀ̹ιýÀÇ º¯°æ³»¿ë Á¦¾È»çÇ×µé- ij³ª´ÙÀ̹μº °ü¸®ÀÚ 2011-02-23 800
>> ÀÌÄÚ³ë¹Ì½ºÆ® ¼±Á¤ ¼¼°è¿¡¼­ »ì±â Á¦ÀÏ ÆíÇÑ µµ½Ã-ij³ª´Ù top1À§ °ü¸®ÀÚ 2011-02-22 857
23 12¿ù ¼ö¼Óµ¿Çâ ¼ö¼ÓÆÀ 2010-12-29 896
22 Äùº¤ ÅõÀÚÀ̹ΠÀ̹α¹ Á¢¼öºñ 2011³â1¿ùºÎÅÍ »óÇâÁ¶Á¤ °ü¸®ÀÚ 2010-12-13 1000
21 2010³â 11¿ù ij³ª´ÙÀ̹Π¼ö¼Óµ¿Çâ ¹ý¹«¼ö¼ÓÆÀ 2010-11-25 849
20 ¿¬¹æÅõÀÚÀ̹Πº¯°æ¹ý Àç°³´Â 2010³â12¿ù1ÀϺÎÅÍ °ü¸®ÀÚ 2010-11-24 808
19 ¸¶´ÏÅä¹Ù À¯ÇÐÈÄÀ̹Π2011³âºÎÅÍ ½ÃÇà °ü¸®ÀÚ 2010-11-15 1775
18 2010³â 10¿ù ij³ª´Ù À̹Π¼ö¼Óµ¿Çâ ¼ö¼ÓÆÀ 2010-11-09 999
17 [Àü¹®ÀηÂÀ̹Π1122 Á÷Á¾ ¸¶°¨] °ü¸®ÀÚ 2010-10-29 860
16 Äùº¤ ÅõÀÚÀ̹ΠÁ¢¼ö°¡ 10¿ù13ÀÏ ÁߴܵǾú½À´Ï´Ù! °ü¸®ÀÚ 2010-10-15 1120
15 2010³â 9¿ù ij³ª´Ù À̹Π¼ö¼Óµ¿Çâ ¼ö¼ÓÆÀ 2010-09-29 968
14 ¹Ì°¶·´¿¡¼­ Á¶»çÇÑ À̹ΰ¡°í ½ÍÀº ³ª¶ó °ü¸®ÀÚ 2010-09-01 855
13 2010³â 8¿ù ij³ª´Ù À̹Π¼ö¼Óµ¿Çâ °ü¸®ÀÚ 2010-08-25 934
12 ¾Ë¹öŸ °¡Á·ÃÊûÀ̹ΠÁß´Ü- AINP Suspends Two Programs °ü¸®ÀÚ 2010-08-24 1097
11 2011³â4¿ù1ÀϺÎÅÍ Ãë¾÷ºñÀÚ ½É»ç °­È­ ¹ßÇ¥ °ü¸®ÀÚ 2010-08-19 890
10 ij³ª´Ù ¹× ¹Ì±¹ Çб³ ÇÐÁ¡ÀÎÁ¤¿©ºÎ È®ÀÎÀº.. °ü¸®ÀÚ 2010-08-11 1254
9 ij³ª´Ù ÇÑÀÎȸ ¿¬¶ôó °ü¸®ÀÚ 2010-08-11 1523
8 »ç¾÷À̹ÎÀ» À¯Ä¡Çϱâ À§ÇÑ ÁÖÁ¤ºÎµéÀÇ °æÀï °ü¸®ÀÚ 2010-08-03 1153
7 Æ÷ºê½º¿¡¼­ Á¶»çÇÑ ±¹°¡º° ÇູÁö¼ö °ü¸®ÀÚ 2010-07-22 2091
6 BCÁÖ ´ëÇпø Á¹¾÷ÀÚÀÇ ¿µÁÖ±Ç Piolt Program °ü¸®ÀÚ 2010-07-16 1367
5 MICC, Äùº¤À̹ΠÄÁ¼³ÅÏÆ® ±ÔÁ¤ ¼öÁ¤¾È°ú ½ÃÇà½Ã±â ¹ßÇ¥ °ü¸®ÀÚ 2010-07-13 2006
4 NEW ¿ÂŸ¸®¿À À¯Çлý(¼®»çÀÌ»ó) ¿µÁÖ±Ç ½Åû ÇÁ·Î±×·¥ °ü¸®ÀÚ 2010-06-30 2302
3 Àü¹®Àη À̹Πº¯°æ°øÁö-ij³ª´Ù À̹α¹ °ü¸®ÀÚ 2010-06-30 1237
2 Canadian Federal Skilled Worker immigration program under review °ü¸®ÀÚ 2010-04-20 1282
1  2